NOTICE: This guide is currently under review, with a new guide to be launched before Semester 1, 2025. In the meantime, please direct any queries or feedback about this guide to the Library's Digital Experience via our Enquiry and Feedback form.
Court reporting is a business.
It is like reporting the news - how a news item is reported by the ABC or SBS, compared with 7, 9, or 10, or on YouTube or Facebook feeds – how there are different versions which emphasise different aspects.
Case reporting series are similar, in that there are different versions of a case.
If a subject specialist series reports a case, there will be an emphasis on that subject with a lot more detail.
Additionally, the subject specialist and generalist reporting series are available the day following the judgment.
Authorised versions are only available annually.
There is one authorised case reporting per jurisdiction.
References to cases in your textbooks include all of the court reporting series where the case can be sourced.
Listing all case reporting series in which a case can be sourced is called giving parallel citations.
All versions are given because readers may have access to only case reporting series.
Parallel citations are listed as a hierarchy, from the most authoritative down.
You should always attempt the most authoritative case reporting service available.
When referencing or citing a case in your assignments, you should only include the citation of the version you have accessed – not all of the parallel citations.
e.g. Hot Holdings Pty Ltd v Creasy (1996) 185 CLR 149.
Source, and cite, the most authoritative version of a case.
The first step students usually undertake in legal research is to look at secondary materials such as encyclopaedias and journal articles to find statements about the law, and to take note of citations to key cases and legislation.
The next step is to use those citations to source the case or legislation.
Sourcing Cases:
Examples:
Your task: Find the same case in print and online: Step 1: Solve the abbreviation of the ALR court reporting series into full using Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations Access the link to Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations from the Law Subject Guide home page. Enter the abbreviation of the Court Reporting Series into the search pane Example: ALR Copy the full title of the reporting series Step 2: Search for the full name of the court reporting series using Library Search: "Australian Law Reports" The Results list from Library Search that includes print and online formats of the Australian Law Reports. Source OnlineStep 3: From the Library Search Results list, select the link to Available Online or Australian law reports (Online) from the Results list Step 4: Select the link to Lexis Advance, below the Available online heading Step 5: Once in the Lexis Advance database, your choice now is to navigate to the case by browsing or searching. In Lexis Advance, the breadcrumb (located at the top of screen) shows you are in the Australian Law Reports. Click on the Download Document button to access the PDF of the case. Source PrintStep 3: Return to the Library Search Results list. Step 4: This tells you to visit the Law Library, located on level 3 of the main Library on Murdoch Campus. Step 5: Follow the shelf numbers to 348.94041 AUS Step 6: From the shelves, locate and select volume 107 of the Australian Law Reports
Step 7: Turn to page 1. This is the first/start page of the judgment for the case Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 107 ALR 1 |
Your task: Find the same case in print and online: Step 1: Solve the abbreviation of the CLR court reporting series into full using Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations Access the link to Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations from the Law Subject Guide home page. Enter the abbreviation of the Court Reporting Series into the search pane Example: CLR Copy the full title of the reporting series Step 2: Search for the full name of the court reporting series using Library Search: "Commonwealth Law Reports" The Results list from Library Search that includes print and online formats of the Commonwealth Law Reports Source OnlineStep 3: From the Library Search Results list, select the link to Available Online or Commonwealth law reports (Online) from the Results list Step 4: Select the link to Westlaw Australia, below the Available online heading Step 5: Once in the Westlaw Australia database, your choice now is to navigate to the case by browsing or searching.
Click on the link Original Image of (1992) 175 CLR 1 to access the PDF of the case.
Source PrintStep 3: Return to the Library Search Results list. Step 4: This tells you to visit the Law Library, located on level 3 of the main Library on the Murdoch Campus. Step 5: Follow the shelf numbers to 348.94041 COM Step 6: From the shelves, locate and select volume 175 of the Commonwealth Law Reports
Step 7: Turn to page 1. This is the first/start page of the judgment for the case Mabo v Queensland (No.2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 |
The abbreviation for a series of law reports is usually the initial letters of the words in the title.
Case law and journal citations are made up of the abbreviation for the case report series or journal.
To find the unabbreviated case report series or journal title you can look at a number of different sources
Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations
Raistrick's Index to Legal Citations and Abbreviations
The Australian Guide to Legal Citation (ALGC) Referencing Guide
The La Trobe University Legal Abbreviations Database
When in CaseBase in Lexis Advance you can access an Abbreviation/Subject List from the help menu.
The main sources for Australian reported cases are Westlaw Australia , Lexis Advance and CCH IntelliConnect
Students also need to be able to access reported decisions from other jurisdictions - particularly the United Kingdom.
For example, English Reports are on the ICLR , Westlaw UK , HeinOnline and CommonLII databases.
The following steps take you through the basics of finding series on databases you should familiarise yourself with, including ICLR, vLexJustis ,Thomson Reuters Westlaw Classic.
Search for medium neutral citations on Jade or AustLII.
You can identify a medium neutral citation as its acronym is for a court, rather than a court reporting series.
eg AAT, AIRCAwd, FamCA, FCA, FWC, HCA
Not everything is online!
You will be surprised how often cases are only available in print on the library shelves and have to be copied.
eg Western Australian Reports 1959-1982
Material is arranged by jurisdiction, and within a jurisdiction, primary material is arranged in the following order: bills, acts, regulations, case law arranged alphabetically by the series name.
This rule is followed in most large law libraries.
R stands for Regina (The Queen), or Rex (The King). You will see that there is sometimes a variation in the citation of a case. For instance R v Arndel (1906) 3 CLR 557 was initially written up as The King, on the Prosecution of Harard Freeman v Arndel. Today it is cited as R v Arndel.
In more recent cases McInnis v R (1979) 143 CLR 575 might be cited in some places as McInnis v The Queen (1979) 143 CLR 575, or as McInnis (1979) 143 CLR 575
Where many people are part of an action the first party's name is usually cited with & Ors (and others).
If there are only two parties the second party may be cited as & Anor (and another). Sometimes only the first party is cited in a citation, e.g. Mabo & Ors v State of Queensland and Ors (No. 2) is usually cited as Mabo v State of Queensland (No. 2).
The Australian Guide to Legal Citation (4th ed, 2018) requires that '& Ors' and '& Another' not be used, with only the first named plaintiff and the first named defendant being cited (ALGC rule 2.1.1).
Lexis Advance is an extensive collection of Australian legal databases.
Lexis Advance can be accessed via the link on the Law Subject Guide.
Search |
Browse |
Step 1: Use Quick Find Case tab on the homepage |
Step 1: From the Publications panel on the homepage, select drop-down arrow for Australian Law Reports
|
Step 2: Add either the case citation OR case name (party names) Tip: if you are unsure about the case name, type in what you know, then wait for suggestions For example: type in the Case Name field Mabo WAIT from the suggestions drop-down menu, select mabo v queensland (no 2) |
Step 2: From the pop-out, select View Table of Contents |
Step 3: Select Search | Step 3:
Expand the Judgment heading by clicking on + Refer to the case citation to see which volume number you are seeking. Mabo v Queensland (No.2) (1992) 107 ALR 1 |
Step 4: Look at the Results list Included in the Results record:
|
Step 4: Navigate down the volume list and select Volume 107 |
Step 5: Select the case name from the Results Example: Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (The Mabo Case) The case name link takes you directly to the CaseBase entry which provides:
From the CaseBase entry, you can also navigate to:
|
Step 5: Expand volume 107 by clicking on + All cases included in this volume will be listed, starting from page 1 to 720, just as they would appear in the print volume |
Note: Where a case has been reported in more than one case series, and one of the case series is an authorised series, you cite the authorised series in preference to the unauthorised. In this instance, therefore, you would use the Mabo citation from the Commonwealth Law Reports in preference to the citation in the Australian Law Reports, which is an unauthorised series. |
Step 6: From the citation, we can see that the Mabo case appears on page one of this volume, so is first in the Results list. |
Step 7: Select the case name from the Results | |
Step 8:
From the case record, you can access:
|
Unreported versions of cases, when first published on Lexis Advance, were given a citation number unique to the Lexis databases.
The ‘BC’ version of a case (Butterworths Citation) should not generally be cited.
Lexis Advanced was previously called LexisNexis.
LexisNexis was previously called Butterworths.
Hence the Butterworths Citation number for older cases.
Butterworths and LexisNexis are both legal publishers, with the same parent company - RELX Group (formerly known as Reed Elsevier).
Westlaw Australia includes most of the Authorised Law Reports.
Westlaw Australia can be accessed via the link on the Law Subject Guide.
Source Cases in Westlaw Australia by Citation
Task:
You are looking for a case and have been given parallel citations:
[1992] HCA 23 | (1992) 175 CLR 1 | (1992) 66 ALJR 408 | (1992) 107 ALR 1
Search Option 1 |
Search Option 2 |
Browse |
Step 1: Choose one citation Type case citation into the Search box, enclosed in double inverted commas "175 CLR 1" WAIT DO NOT CLICK SEARCH WAIT FOR SUGGESTIONS |
Step 1: Select Cases from the Content types on the Westlaw Australia home page |
Step 1: Select Cases from the Content types on the Westlaw Australia home page |
Step 2: Select the relevant case from the drop-down suggestion/s |
Step 2: Select Advanced search |
Step 2: Select All Cases by Series
|
Included in the Results record:
|
Step 3: Complete the Citation field; Search |
Step 3: Select Commonwealth Law Reports from the Authorised Law Reports list |
Click on the Other Versions drop-down arrow to access the authorised version |
Step 4: Select relevant result |
Step 4: From the Filters panel, expand Date to be able to browse by date |
Step 5: |
Step 1: Select Other Versions to view the drop down menu
Step 2: Select CLR Version from the drop down menu |
|
Step 3: Select Original Image of (1992) 175 CLR 1 to access a PDF of the CLR version |
AustLII can be accessed via the link on the Law Subject Guide.
Step 1: Access AustLII (Australasian Legal Information Institute)
Step 2: In the search pane at the top of the screen, add case citation "175 CLR 1" or "1992 HCA 23"
Step 3: Select the magnifying glass icon to Search
Step 4: From the Results list, navigate to Mabo v Queensland (No 2) ("Mabo case") [1992] HCA 23; (1992) 175 CLR 1 (3 June 1992); click on the case name
Step 5: From the case record, you can access the High Court of Australia case report entry: [1992] HCA 23.
From this page you can access:
Tip: expand the number of Results per page to 100 (default is 10)
Jade provides all Australian legal judgments from Australian Courts and Tribunals.
Jade can be accessed via the link on the Law Subject Guide.
BarNet is a not-for-profit organisation and JADE is one of their initiatives to provide better legal research to the profession.
Register for free with your Murdoch University student email to automatically receive Jade Professional access.
Your Jade login details have been sent to your Murdoch Student email account: [StudentNumber]@student.murdoch.edu.au.
Jade Professional enables the Visualisations feature, and allows the creation of JADE Alerts.
Additionally, the Citation functionality is enhanced (you will need this to complete the lesson and Library Research Test).
Jade is a valuable legal research tool as it is available for free, unlike databases such as Lexis Advance and Westlaw AU that require a subscription fee.
Search Jade |
Browse Jade |
Step 1: In the search pane at the top of the screen, add case citation |
Step 1: Select the Jade Browser tab Refer to the case citation to see which court you are seeking. Mabo v Queensland (No.2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1; 66 ALJR 408; 107 ALR 1 |
Step 2: From the drop down offered suggestions, select 175 CLR 1; [1992] HCA 23; Mabo [No.2] - document in Jade |
Step 2: From the Browse Collection pane (located on the left of screen or select the Jade Browser tab), select By court from the Judgments section |
Step 3: Select Search now |
Step 3: Select High Court of Australia (HCA) |
Step 4: From the case record, you can access the High Court of Australia case report entry: [1992] HCA 23.
Note the High Court’s transcripts (the record of its proceedings which includes the full text of citations referred to by counsel during the hearings) attached to the top of the document.
|
Step 4: Select the year 1992 |
Step 5: Use the Visualisation tools to represent the citation information graphically |
Step 5: Navigate down the case list to case 23 (on page 2 of Results)
We know we are looking for the 23rd judgment handed down in 1992 from the citation: [1992] HCA 23 |
Step 6: Use the Print and Export option to download the PDF version of the case |
Step 6: Select the case name from the Results |
You will only be able to view the Case Citations for each section of the case if you are logged in using your feee Jade Professional account:
CCH iKnowConnect includes commentary and case law on specialist legal topics including:
bankruptcy and insolvency | employment and HR | insurance law | torts & personal injury |
business and company law | environmental law | intellectual property | taxation |
corporate and securities law | family law | sports law | trusts & estates |
conveyancing and property | industrial relations | taxation | workplace health & safety |
CCH iKnowConnect can be accessed via the link on the Legal Research Guide.
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v City Of Swan; Lehman Brothers Asia Holdings Limited (In Liquidation) v City Of Swan (2010) 28 ACLC ¶10-011
Source Case by Citation |
Browse for Case by Citation |
Search for Case |
Step 1: Solve the abbreviation of the ACLC court reporting service into full using Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations |
Step 1: Select the briefcase icon to expand the Your practice areas list in the navigation pane on the left-hand side of the screen. From the list select Company law Cases |
Step 1: In the top search box, type the case citation or party names |
Step 2: Search for the full name of the court reporting service using Library Search The Results list from Library Search that includes print and online formats |
Step 2: This opens a reverse-numerical volume listing for the Australian Company Law Cases.
Refer to the case citation to see which year you are seeking. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v City Of Swan; Lehman Brothers Asia Holdings Limited (In Liquidation) v City Of Swan (2010) 28 ACLC ¶10-011
|
Step 2: Select the case with the relevant citation from the Results list |
Step 3: Select the link to Full Text Online or Australian company law cases (Online) from the Results list |
Step 3: Navigate down the year list to 2010 CASES |
|
Step 4: The link opens directly into CCH iKnowiConnect, at the Australian Company Law Cases. Your choice now is to navigate to the case by browsing the relevant year or searching.
|
Step 4: Navigate down the list of cases to the 11th case We know this from the citation: 28 ACLC ¶10-011 |
|
Students need to be able to access reported decisions from other jurisdictions - particularly the United Kingdom.
For example, English Reports are on the ICLR, Westlaw UK HeinOnline and CommonLII databases.
HeinOnline Browse |
HeinOnline Search |
ICLRTask: Source UK case: |
|
HeinOnline contains journals and monographs from many publishers. The Law Journal Library contains top academic legal periodicals. It also includes, among other things, English Reports Full Reprint (1220-1865) and Legal Classics monograph collection. You access HeinOnline via the Law Subject Guide. |
ICLR is the authorised publisher of the official series of The Law Reports for the Superior and Appellate Courts of England and Wales. |
||
Step 1: From the Browse Databases by Name panel, click on the English Reports | Step 1: From the Browse Databases by Name panel, click on the English Reports |
Step 1: Solve the abbreviation KB into full using Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations |
|
Step 2: From the pop-out, click on English Reports |
Step 2: From the pop-out, click on English Reports |
Step 2: Search for the full name of the court reporting service using Library Search
|
|
Step 3: Below the search box, select |
Step 3: Enter the case name or citation in the search Select the relevant radio button to specify the type of search |
Step 3: Source the court reporting service on the correct database by clicking the Online link.
|
|
Step 4: From the list of English Reports, select the relevant title. |
Step 4: Click on Locate |
Step 4: Search ICLR using case citation or case title |
|
|
Advanced Search is located at the top of the English Reports screen |
vLexJustis is an online legal research platform that helps you find leading authorities and establish the current status of the law.
vLexJustis is a full text online legal library of UK, Irish and EU case law.
It includes Daily Cases, Law Reports, Weekly Law Reports, Times Law Reports and Singapore Law Reports.
You can access vLexJustis via the Databases link on the Law Subject Guide homepage.
Step 1: Solve the abbreviation
Step 2: Search for the series title
Step 3: Source the series location on the shelves
Step 4: Once you have located the series you would be able to find the volume and then the page number.
Your Task: Find this case from the law reports on the shelves in the Library: Mabo v Queensland [No 2] 175 CLR 1
Step 1: Solve the abbreviation CLR using Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations
Step 2: Search for the unabbreviated series title once you have identified the series; search for Commonwealth Law Reports using Library Search.
Step 3: Source the court reporting series.
From the resulting list, select the listing for Commonwealth Law Reports.
As you are looking for the print version of the series, select the listing that makes no reference to it being (Online) or an [electronic resource].
The access line in the Results record should say to Check Shelf.
Step 4: To find the Mabo case, you must go back to the citation: 175 CLR 1
175: This is the volume number, so when you have located the Commonwealth Law Reports, you need to find volume 175.
Look along the volumes of the Commonwealth Law Reports until you find volume 175.
CLR: You have already ascertained that this is the abbreviation for the Commonwealth Law Reports
1: This is the first page of the case report itself. Once you have found volume 175 of the Commonwealth Law Reports, turn to page 1 to find the Mabo case.
A series of court reports officially approved by the judiciary or government is known as an authorised or official series of reports.
In each jurisdiction only one series is designated as authorised.
Cases which enunciate a general principle or point of law are usually included in the authorised series of reports.
Jurisdiction/Court |
Series |
Citation |
Federal Court |
Federal Court Reports 1984+ |
|
High Court | Commonwealth Law Reports 1903+ | CLR |
Administrative Appeals Tribunal |
Administrative Law Decisions 1976+ |
|
Australian Industrial Relations Commission |
Industrial Reports (Authorised reports of the AIRC are included from Vol. 154, 2006+) |
|
Industrial Relations Commission |
Commonwealth Arbitration Report(s) 1905-1993 |
|
Veterans Review Board | Repatriation Pension Decisions 1985+ | RPD |
Supreme Court of New South Wales |
New South Wales Law Reports 1970+ State Reports NSW 1901 – 1970 New South Wales Law Reports 1825 – 1900 |
|
Northern Territory |
Northern Territory Law Reports 1991+ |
|
Queensland |
Queensland Reports 1958+ State Reports. Queensland 1902-57 |
|
South Australia |
South Australian State Reports 1971+ State Reports. South Australia 1921-71 South Australian Law Reports 1865-1920 |
|
Tasmania |
Tasmanian Reports 1979+ State Reports Tasmania 1941-1978 Tasmanian Law Reports 1897-1940 |
|
Victoria |
Victorian Reports 1957+ Victorian Law Reports 1875-1956 |
|
Western Australia |
Western Australian Reports 1983+ Western Australian Reports 1960-1982 - print only Western Australian Law Reports 1898-1959 |
The authorised version of the report should always be used where available.
The version of a case to be cited should follow the preference order below (from top to bottom):
Version | Examples |
---|---|
Authorised report | CLR, FCR, NSWLR, VR,WAR |
Generalist unauthorised report | ALR, AJLR, FLR, ACTR |
Subject-specific unauthorised report | A Crim R, ACSR, IR, IPR |
Unreported (medium neutral citation) | HCA, FCA, NSWSC, VSC |
Unreported (no medium neutral citation) | See rule 2.3.2 |
Authorised or official reports are those selected and approved by the judiciary, their nominees, or relevant governments department (a Council or Board of Law Reporting).
In each jurisdiction only one series is designated authorised.
Cases which enunciate a general principle or point of law are usually included in the authorised series of reports.
In Western Australia, for example, the Attorney General regulates law reporting.
The Law Reporting Advisory Board advises the Attorney General.
The Law Reporting Advisory Board comprises 6 members appointed by the Governor of whom —
(a) one member shall be a Judge of the Supreme Court nominated by the Chief Justice and shall be the chairman of the Board;
(b) one member nominated by the Chief Justice shall be either a Judge of The District Court of Western Australia or a Judge of the Family Court of Western Australia;
(c) 3 members shall be legal practitioners nominated by the Council of the Law Society; and
(d) one member shall be a legal practitioner nominated by the Attorney General.
(Law Reporting Act 1981 (WA) s7.)
While series of reports which are not authorised are still acceptable in courts, if a case has been reported in an authorised series as well as another series, it is preferable to cite the authorised report.
An authorised report should always be cited in preference to an unauthorised report, (Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA) 0.34.5.9A)
Unauthorised series of reports are produced more quickly and many are directed towards satisfying the needs of specialist practitioners.
Unauthorised series of reports include many reports of cases which may be published later in an authorised series, however they also include reports which may only be of transient interest, or illustrate the application of authoritative cases.
The Australian Trade Practices Reports and Family Law Reports are examples of series which only report cases relevant to the subject area indicated in the title.
Few series are mutually exclusive. Cases may appear in several series depending on editorial interest and assessment of the importance of the case.
For example significant High Court decisions are reported in each of the following series: the Commonwealth Law Reports (CLR), Australian Law Reports (ALR) and Australian Law Journal Reports (ALJR).
The ALR and ALJR are unauthorised series and the CLR authorised.
The Authorised Report Series is a list of authorised reports of various jurisdictions, the citation is given in bold eg, CLR.
Except for reports without hyperlinks, all of the reports listed are held at Murdoch or are available online through one of the case law databases.
The general arrangement of law reports held in the library is by jurisdiction first (eg. Australia, Western Australia, New South Wales, United Kingdom, USA, Canada), and then alphabetically by title within the jurisdiction.
A case citator is an incredibly useful tool to use for legal research.
Case citators are a type of case law index.
Case citators do not provide the full text of a case but you may be linked to full text versions of the case where the publisher of the citator publishes the case series (i.e. FirstPoint from Westlaw AU will link to the Commonwealth Law Reports).
Citators can assist legal researchers in locating a variety of useful information about the case.
Case citators can be useful in helping you determine:
Case citators all use a different variety of symbols to provide guidance on whether or not the case is still considered good law.
They use symbols and annotations to explain the current status of the case.
The Citators themselves have useful guides that can help you understand these.
Cases referred to (as precedent) in a case, are referred to as being cited by.
So these judgments must have been made before the case.
Cases referring to a case are referred to as citing a case.
So these judgments must have been made after the case.
Students of Murdoch University have access to a number of case citators including:
Australian Citators include:
International Citators include:
Many of the online case citators also provide a case digest feature which provides a summary of the main points of the case and can save researchers time by helping them determine the relevance of the case to the issues researched.
Case digests such as FirstPoint provide this kind of summary.
You should be aware that these summaries are produced by editors who may have very different ideas to yourself about what should be put in a summary.
You have now been introduced to a range of hard copy and online resources to help you find cases when you have a citation.
There is a lot of information covered in this topic so go through it carefully.
The information here is designed to get you started using these databases.
Practice using these databases to become familiar with the way they function.