Use the Research Strategy Template to organise your legal research.
Record:
- Databases searched
- Filters used
- Search words
- Search strings
- Resources sourced - legislation, cases, articles - supporting your argument
Cite / reference ALL information at the time of sourcing.
The Library's Assignment Help Guide will assist with organising your assignment.
Task list generators such as To-do, or Trello are useful for group assignments.
Create timelines for each Unit to keep a track of your workload and assist with prioritising your workload.
Timelines can be easily created in an Excel spreadsheet.
Post It Notes are just as effective!
Use the interactive resources on the Academic Skills Unit on LMS to improve your academic reading, critical thinking, research, writing and presentation skills.
Use learning tools, such as Quizlet, to organise your course work and notes in preparation for your research.
For guidance on how to develop a good search strategy and technique see:
1. Develop a writing plan
what issues must specifically be addressed, answered or included
mind map your plan
2. Develop a search strategy
determine search words
list synonyms
create search strings for searching databases - use Boolean connectors
determine which databases to search
TIP: Read a legal encyclopaedia, or journal, article, to identify additional search terms
3. Manage time and resources
Record all resources, including quotations and their page numbers
4. Reference
TIP: Ensure your reference complies with the Australian Guide to Legal Citation rules when you first access the resource (in Step 3.)
- don't leave your referencing until the last minute.
Use the AGLC Referencing Style Guide for easy citation.
Structure your notes with headings, subheadings and lists.
Use headings to indicate topic areas or to include bibliographic details of the sources of information.
Use outline form and/or a numbering system and indenting to help you distinguish major from minor points and as a clear way of indicating the structure of lecture information.
Underline, circle, star, highlight, key information, examples, definitions, important facts.
Devise your own marking code to use consistently.
Write phrases and key points.
Don't write verbatim transcripts.
Hand writing notes aids memory retention and encourages paraphrasing (making you think and understand concepts)
Include reference details.
Include reference details for further research or to cite in open book exams.
These can be added after the lecture from the PPT or recording.
Magdalinski, Tara, Study skills for sports studies (Taylor and Francis, 2013) ch 3 Making Notes from Lectures and Readings
How to take notes and study smarter
my Murdoch Peer Academic Coaches (PAC) can help with:
Boolean Operators must be ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
Universal Operators |
||
AND |
2 or more words anywhere in document |
case AND law the word case as well as the word law anywhere in the document |
OR |
1 or more words anywhere in document |
case OR law either the word case or the word law anywhere in the document |
" " |
phrase search |
"case law" the words case law next to each other in that order |
( ) |
group words together |
(case OR law) AND evidence either the word case or the word law anywhere in the document, as well as the word evidence |
Order of priority : ( ), OR, PROXIMITY, AND
Searches are processed by brackets first, then from left to right - so place most important terms first.
AustLII | CCH iKnowConnect | CINAHL | Gale Academic OneFile |
HeinOnline | i-law | Informit | Jade | JSTOR | Lexis Advance |
Library Search |
Newsbank | Ovid | Oxford Legal Research |
ProQuest | Scopus | Thomson Reuters Westlaw Classic |
Web of Science | Westlaw Australia | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proximity 1st word within n words of 2nd word case /5 law case within 5 words of law, |
W/5 |
W/5 |
N5 |
N5 W5 |
~5 |
NEAR5 |
%5 |
/5 |
~5 case law~5 NEAR 5 only works in |
NEAR5 |
/5 |
~5 |
NEAR5
ADJ5 specifies order |
ADJ5 (n-1 so ADJ5 |
- |
NEAR/5 |
n5 | W/5 |
/5 |
NEAR/5 Be aware that |
/5 |
Truncator Word variations law* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
! |
At least search word/phrase must appear atleast5(merger) atl5(merger)
|
ATL5(word) |
word.ab./FREQ=5 |
ATLEAST5(word)
|
Provide an overview of current WA law for using a phone when driving
using phone driving
Date range: current Jurisdiction: Western Australia
using | phone | driving |
conduct! distract! hold! inattent! use OR using |
phone telephone text! |
automobile car "dangerous thing!" driv! vehicle |
((conduct! OR distract! OR hold! OR inattent! OR use OR using) /15 (phone OR telephone OR text)) /25 (automobile OR car OR "dangerous thing!" OR driv! OR vehicle)
Search strings are created using search terms, their synonyms, and Boolean operators and connectors.
Example search string:
((balance OR distribut! OR separat!) /5 power!) AND commonwealth AND state
This search string will search for:
balance within 5 words of power - any order
distribute within 5 words of power - any order
distributed within 5 words of power - any order
distribution within 5 words of power - any order
separate within 5 words of power - any order
separated within 5 words of power - any order
separation within 5 words of power - any order
One or more of the above must appear in a document, as well as the word commonwealth, as well as the word state
Note: search words remain in the singular, as the databases will automatically search for singular and plural - even woman/women
Sample search string to source the meaning of slavery:
(character! OR defin! OR describ! OR expla! OR interpret! OR mean!) /25 slave!
Databases do not like the formatting Word places to make quotation marks curly.
Remove the automatic formatting so you can create search strings and paste these straight into a database.
To do this:
Select Proofing | Select AutoFormat | Select AutoFormat As You Type |
Identify search words |
||
|
|
|
Issue(s)
Rule(s)
Application
Conclusion
Step 1: Identify Parties by name and their role in proceedings
* plaintiff
* defendant
Step 2: Identify Particulars
* the injury/harm/loss
* the alleged wrong doings
Step 3: Identify all possible Tortious Causes of Action (COA)
Step 4: Identify the Elements of the COA
* define COA
* cite relevant authorities
* this sentence should include Step 1 (identifying the parties), Step 2 (identifying the injuries and alleged wrongdoing), Step 3 (the possible cause of action) and Step 4 (identifying the elements). Note that a relevant legal authority for the law (that is, the elements of the cause of action) should also be cited
eg Patsy, the plaintiff, could sue Darren, the defendant, in negligence for his failure to stop at a red traffic light which caused property damage to her car and personal injury in the form of a broken arm: Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.
Step 5: Identify the law governing the Elements of the COA
* cite relevant authorities which govern the elements of the cause of action the plaintiff is trying to establish
Step 6: Apply the law to the facts
* define/explain each element
* argue whether the legal rule/principle is satisfied by the facts in the scenario using relevant authorities
* every legal principle must be supported with the relevant/best authority (case law or a section of legislation)
* for contentious elements, outline both sides of the argument (e.g. the strengths and weakness of the party’s case)
* use case law as authority OR use case law for analogy
Step 7: Consider Defences
* identify defences arising on the facts
* apply the law to the facts for the relevant defences
Step 8: Consider Remedies
* identify remedies arising on the facts
* apply the law to the facts for the relevant remedies
Step 9: Conclusion
* give a brief conclusion regarding the likely outcome
* highlight the controversial or uncertain matters
* justify your conclusion
Tip:
* use the language of the legislation
example: s 5B of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA) uses the term ‘not insignificant’; use this term, don’t change it to ‘significant’
APA - Criminology, Education, Nursing, Psychology, Tourism
Chicago - Business & Governance,Transition Units, Multidisciplinary
MLA - English
ACS - Chemistry
AGLC - Law
Footnote - Humanities, Social Sciences
IEEE - Computer Science, Electronics, Engineering, Information Technology
SBL - Theology
Vancouver - Biomedicine, Health Sciences
Word inserts a reference mark in the text and adds the footnote at the bottom of the page.
1. Click where you want to add the footnote.
2. Select References > Insert Footnote.
3. Type the footnote text.
4. To return to your place in your document, double-click the footnote mark.
Shortcut: Ctrl+Alt+F to insert a footnote.
A more detailed explanation can be accessed from How to Add a Footnote to Microsoft Word
- include all sources consulted to inform you about a topic
- include only those sources cited/referenced in footnotes
To use AGLC with EndNote you will need to download and save 2 small files from the Install AGLC Referencing Style to EndNote link below:
Note: EndNote has a number of issues with AGLC.
Make a Plain Text Copy as a final step and manually edit the Word document into Headings or Sections.
In every unit, you will be informed about the marking criteria for assessments.
Different academics will generate this in different ways.
Research essays or written work are marked with consideration given to where the piece of work falls in the context of the grade descriptors.
The marker asks themselves - where does this piece of work sit between a P and an HD?
If you have not met the learning objective, you may be marked lower than a P. The Legal Practice Board expects you to have basic competencies. You cannot receive a pass mark if you do not have these.)
The marker then determines whether the work just scrapes into that grade band, whether it is a solid performance in that grade band, or whether it is almost, but not quite, the grade band above.
The University sets out descriptors for each grade. These are set out in the Unit Guide.
An HD grade recognises the work is of an exceptional standard. That means only a few papers will get it. (Otherwise it would not be exceptional.)
Obtaining such grades takes hard work and a fastidious approach to research and writing.
It needs to be excellent in every respect.
If there are spelling errors, or errors in citation, the mark will drop significantly.
It is virtually impossible to get a mark of 100% in a research essay.
Even a mark of 90% or above is incredibly rare and a mark of 80% is a significant achievement.
You can always improve the quality of expression.
There is always more research that could be done.
The marker has to leave room for the possibility that someone else will come along with an even better piece of writing.
A mark slightly below the percent off the next grade - eg 68% - is a deliberate decision by your marker.
In other words, your work was assessed as being at the higher end of that grade, but not quite at the level of the next grade.
Students who ask 'Where did I lose marks?' have missed the point.
The feedback you receive - whether a marking matrix, comments, or general feedback to the class - should explain to you why you earned that grade.
Some assessments are not assessing your written work.
They might be of a style where you can score 'perfect' marks - such as a Library Research Test, a multi choice assessment, a citation quiz, a grammar quiz, or a research report.
If you follow the instructions to the letter, and understand the task that has been set, you can earn a very high mark.
Such assessments are usually not weighted very much because they can over-inflate the marks overall.
Because it is easy to do well in those types of tests, you cannot necessarily expect those marks to be a predictor of your future performance in the written assessment for the unit.
In other words, 'bank' the marks but don't get complacent!
This marking explanation also applies for exam marking.
- Kate Lewins 2020
Literature Review |
Annotated Bibliography |
|
Purpose | Provides an overview of significant sources of scholarly research on a topic, issue, or answers a question Provides summary and explanation of key themes in the literature supported by relevant sources |
Provides an ordered list of sources for research Provides brief explanation for each source as to why it is credible and relevant to the topic or issue Reader gains an understanding of available sources on a topic |
Structure |
Introduction explains topic |
Introduction provides a brief and precise overview the research topic, types of sources included, process used to locate sources, and scope of bibliography |
If you are conducting a literature review, then visit the Literature Review Research Guide. |
An annotated bibliography provides a brief overview of the available research on a topic.
Each information source is accompanied by a citation that is followed by a brief descriptive paragraph.
An annotated bibliography provides an assessment of the relevance and quality of the material on a topic. .
The description can:
Use examples from other annotated bibliographies to guide and check your writing style
The bibliographical information may be
When you compose your annotated bibliography, you will need to consider each part of the bibliography.
Sentence starters can help to focus on these.
The parts of a bibliography entry | Examples | ||
Descriptive steps 1-3 |
1 | The citation information should be in the same format as it would be in the reference list – leave a line below the citation |
Example of an APA reference Example of an AGLC reference |
2 | A short statement of the author’s viewpoint | Example of sentence starters *In this article, Griffiths reviews . . . *This article examines . . . *The authors describe . . . *The author’s purpose is to challenge . . . |
|
3 | A short summary of the theory, research findings or argument | Example of sentence starters *The main ideas expressed are . . . *Support for these claims is documented . . . *Griffiths has conducted a thorough investigation of . . . *The author’s research focuses on . . . |
|
Descriptive and evaluative steps 1-5
|
4 | Comments on the usefulness and/or limitations of the text for your research | Example of sentence starters *The author provides a strong theoretical . . . *The writing style considers a range of audiences . . . *Theories are supported by well-known researchers in this field, such as . . . *There is a lack of supporting evidence . . . *The main limitation of the website . . . |
5 | An evaluative comment on the work, taking into account how this work will fit into your research on a topic | Example of sentence starters *This article is useful for the research topic . . . * Because the information is up-to-date and from a reliable source . . . * It is relevant to the thesis because . . . * In particular, this article will assist . . . |
Case note components:
(a) Case citation details
(b) Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment)
(c) Issues (what is in dispute)
(d) Holding (the applied rule of law)
(e) Rationale (reasons for the holding)
More details on writing case summaries:
How To Write a Case Brief For Law School
10 Tips on Making Case Summaries
COMPONENT |
DESCRIPTION |
WHAT SHOULD APPEAR
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASE DETAILS |
Case citation (choose the most authoritative report series) Type of court and procedural history of the case (for example, previous courts the matter was heard in, previous decision and who appealed) Judge(s)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROCEDURAL HISTORY |
Appeal/hearing details |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASE FACTS |
Facts of case What went wrong Reason for dispute
Legal facts
Reason for court case (phrase as a yes/no question) |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSUES AT LAW
|
State legal principle (decided by Court) Legal principle/rule applied to legal facts Legal significance/important facts Did it change an established precedent
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MAJOR ARGUMENTS
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RATIO DECIDENDI (LEGAL REASONING)
|
Identify each judge's decision Reasons for decision/s Note any dissents (divergence in judicial opinions) Understand the holding(the answer to the question the court posed)
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DECISION COMMENTARY
|
Analyse decision relevant to existing law (often referred to within the judgement itself)
How does case enhance understanding of existing law
Background/discussion of prior law - if the decision departed from previous cases, was this appropriate (changes to policy, societal values, political climate, bias)
Is the decision: Contradictory to prior decisions logical consistent
Refer to: Past cases International/interstate law Extrinsic materials eg Second Reading Speeches
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONCLUSION |
Do you agree with the majority or dissent
Would you agree/disagree – but for different reasons than those of the judges
Suggest changes to existing law
Explain why your approach is more appropriate or achieves greater justice
|
|
MEMORANDUM
TO: [reader] (e.g., instructing lawyer, client, judge)
DATE: [date of submission]
FILE: [file number; client/matter]
SUBJECT: [topic] (describe precisely)
Table of Contents
Background / Purpose
Facts
Assumptions
Issues
Conclusions
Legislation
Discussion / Analysis
Reference List
Appendix
How to Source
|
How to Source
|
How to Source
|
Acts / StatutesBillsDefinitions in ActsDelegated LegislationExplanatory MemorandaGovernment GazettesHansardLaw Reform CommissionParliamentary CommitteesSecond Reading SpeechTreatiesWA State Agreements |
CasesFamous CasesAppealed CasesAuthorised Court Reporting SeriesDefinitionsCases Considering ActsCases Considering CasesCases Considered in Journal ArticlesSimilar Cases |
BooksCommentaryDictionariesEncyclopaediaNewspaper ArticlesMedia StatementsPeer ReviewedJournal Articles:
|
Image: Rhii Photography https://unsplash.com/photos/cl8dqBQgRGY |
Image: Tingey Injury Law Firm https://unsplash.com/photos/NcNqTsq-UVY |
Image: Annie Spratt https://unsplash.com/photos/_dAnK9GJvdY |