Skip to Main Content

Legal Research - Subject Guide RED TABS: Sourcing Case Law

 

NOTICE: This guide is currently under review, with a new guide to be launched before Semester 1, 2025. In the meantime, please direct any queries or feedback about this guide to the Library's Digital Experience via our Enquiry and Feedback form.

Sourcing Case Law

You need to know which database to search to find a case.
Otherwise, it's like trying to find Wonder Woman in a Marvel comic.

Sourcing Cases:

  • Step 1: Translate the abbreviation of the court reporting service into full using Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations
  • Step 2: Search for the full name of the court reporting service using Library Search
  • Step 3: Source the court reporting service on the correct database (e.g. Lexis Advance or WestlawAU) or Library shelves (e.g. All England Law Reports)

 

View these step-by-step instructions for sourcing cases from a citation (e.g. 249 CLR 435).


Note the extra resources supplied when using
CaseBase and FirstPoint.

Cardiff Index to Legal Abbreviations
Library Search:
CaseBase:
(Lexis Advance Pacific)
FirstPoint:
(Westlaw AU)

 

View these step-by-step instructions for sourcing cases using specific databases:

AustLII:
CCH IntelliConnect:
Jade:
Lexis Advance:
Westlaw AU:
JustCite (for UK cases):

Learn more in the Case Law Lesson.

Wardens Court for WA mining law disputes 

Famous cases

For famous cases, such as the AAP Case, Engineers Case, Mabo Case, Seas & Submerged Lands Case and the Woollen Underwear Case, start by search legal encyclopaedias and case citators (they are often referred to by their common names):

Cases often asked for:

Associated Minerals Pty Ltd v NSW Rutile Mining Company Pty Ltd [1962] ALR 236; (1961) 35 ALJR 296
A citation often supplied for this case is (1961) 35 ALJR 256

  • The citation is incorrect
  • Volume and ALJR are correct, but the page number is incorrect
  • Search for the case on JADE to find it referred to in another case - this time with the correct page number

Atkins v Egypt Holdings Pty Ltd (unreported, SCWA, 10 July 1987)

  • Lexis Advance  >  Cases Search Template  >  Case Name:  Atkins AND Egypt Holdings  +  Jurisdiction: Western Australia

Crocker Consolidated v Willie [1988] WAR 187

  • Westlaw AU  >  Cases Search Template  >  Citation:  [1988] WAR 187

 

A series of court reports officially approved by the judiciary or government is known as an authorised or official series of reports.

In each jurisdiction only one series is designated as authorised.

Cases which enunciate a general principle or point of law are usually included in the authorised series of reports.

 

Australia

Jurisdiction

Series

Citation

Federal Court

Federal Court Reports 1984+

FCR

High Court Commonwealth Law Reports 1903+ CLR

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Administrative Law Decisions 1976+

ALD

Australian Industrial Relations Commission

Industrial Reports (Authorised reports of the AIRC are included from Vol. 154, 2006+)

IR

Industrial Relations Commission

Commonwealth Arbitration Report(s) 1905-1993

CAR

Veterans Review Board Repatriation Pension Decisions 1985+ RPD

Supreme Court of New South Wales

New South Wales Law Reports 1970+

State Reports NSW 1901 – 1970

New South Wales Law Reports 1825 – 1900

NSWLR

SR NSW

NSWLR

Northern Territory

Northern Territory Law Reports 1991+

NTLR

Queensland

Queensland Reports 1958+

State Reports. Queensland 1902-57

QdR

St R Qd

South Australia

South Australian State Reports 1971+

State Reports. South Australia 1921-71

South Australian Law Reports 1865-1920

SASR

SRSA

SALR

Tasmania

Tasmanian Reports 1979+

State Reports Tasmania 1941-1978

Tasmanian Law Reports 1897-1940

Tas R

Tas SR

TLR

Victoria

Victorian Reports 1957+

Victorian Law Reports 1875-1956

VR

VLR

Western Australia

Western Australian Reports 1983+ 

Western Australian Reports 1960-1982 - print only 

Western Australian Law Reports 1898-1959

WAR

WAR

WALR


 

New Zealand

Jurisdiction

Series

Citation

Court of Appeal

High Court

New Zealand Law Reports 1883+

NZLR

England & Wales

The Law Report Series had several title variations between 1866 and 1891.

Since 1891 the following have been established as the current Law Reports Series:

Jurisdiction

Series

Citation

High Court

Chancery Division 1891+

Ch.D or Ch

High Court

Probate, Divorce and Admiralty

P. or P.D.

High Court

Division 1891-1971 Family Division 1972+

Fam

High Court

Queen’s/King’s Bench Division 1891+

QB or KB

House of Lords & Privy Council

Appeal Cases 1891+

A.C.

Government official reports

Reports of Patent, Design & Trade Mark Cases 1884+

RPC

Government official reports Reports of Tax Cases 1875+ TC


 

Northern Ireland

Jurisdiction

Series

Citation

Superior Courts &
Appeals to the House of Lords

Northern Ireland Law Reports 1925 +

NI
or
NILR

Scotland

Jurisdiction

Series

Citation

Court of Appeal

Court of Session &
High Court of Judiciary

Session Cases 1821+

SC

Canada

Jurisdiction

Series

Citation

Supreme Court

Canada Supreme Court Reports 1970+

Canada Law Reports, Supreme Court of Canada 1923-69

Canada Supreme Court Reports 1876-1922

SCR

Exchequer Court

Canada Law Reports, Exchequer Court of Canada 1923-1969

Reports of the Exchequer Court of Canada 1881-1922

Ex.CR

Federal Court

Canada Federal Court Reports 1971

FCR

United States of America

Jurisdiction

Series

Citation

Supreme Court

United States Supreme Court Reports 1790+

USSC.Rep
or
US

Western Australian Reports

Western Australian Reports 1983+ - Westlaw AU

Western Australian Reports 1959-1982 - print only - Murdoch Law Library

Western Australian Law Reports 1898-1958 - AustLII

There is an ongoing copyright dispute over the WAR 1959-1982, so they are not available online until this is resolved.

Lexis Advance Westlaw AU

Step 1:

Access Lexis Advance

Step 1:

Access Westlaw AU

Step 2:

Select drop-down arrow beside Advanced Search
Select Cases

Step 2:

Select Cases Search Template
located to the left of screen

Step 3:

In the Terms pane:

(character! OR compris! OR defin! OR describ! OR discuss! OR element! OR expla! OR interpret! OR mean! OR phras!) /15 SearchWord

Step 3:

In the Free Text pane:

(character! OR compris! OR defin! OR describ! OR discuss! OR element! OR expla! OR interpret! OR mean! OR phras!) /15 SearchWord

 

Step 4:

Select Search

Step 4:

Select Search

Step 5:

Narrow results by Jurisdiction
located to the left of screen

Step 5:

Filter results by Jurisdiction
located to the left of screen

 

 

​View these step-by-step instructions for sourcing terms that have been considered in cases (judicial consideration) using specific databases:

Lexis Advance Pacific:
WestlawAU

 

Sample search string for definition of slavery:

(character* OR compris* OR defin* OR describ* OR discuss* OR element* OR expla* OR interpret* OR mean* OR phras*) /15  slave*

General search instructions

In each database:

  • select Cases search template
  • select relevant jurisdiction
  • complete the Legislation name and provision text boxes
  • select relevant Court, if required 

View these step-by-step instructions for sourcing cases considering Acts using specific databases:

AustLII:
CCH IntelliConnect:
Jade:
LawCite:
Lexis Advance:
Westlaw AU:

Find more information on : Judicial consideration of legislation

General search instructions

In each database:

  • select Cases Advanced Search
  • search by case name or citation 
  • select Cited by

View these step-by-step instructions for sourcing cases citing cases (judicial consideration) using specific databases:

AustLII:
CCH IntelliConnect:
Jade:
LawCite:
Lexis Advance:
Westlaw AU:

Find more information on : Judicial consideration of cases

General search instructions

In each database:

  • select Journals Advanced Search
  • search by case name or citation 
  • select Journals referring to this case

View these step-by-step instructions for sourcing cases considered in journal articles using specific databases:

AustLII:
CCH IntelliConnect:
Informit:
LawCite:
Lexis Advance:
Westlaw AU:

Court Annotations

The following is list of annotations used by the court in the subsequent appeal proceedings or in the subsequent case where the primary case has been judicially considered.

  • Applied A principle of law articulated in the primary case is applied to a new set of facts by the court in the subsequent case.
  • Approved The court in the subsequent case has approved the way the court in the primary case, being a court of inferior jurisdiction, has articulated a principle of law.
  • Cited The primary case is merely cited by the court in the subsequent case, without comment.
  • Considered The legal principles articulated in the primary case are considered or discussed without adverse reflection in the subsequent case.
  • Disapproved The decision in the primary case is criticised by the court in the subsequent case.
  • Distinguished The court in the subsequent case holds that the legal principles articulated by the primary case (usually otherwise persuasive or binding authority) do not apply because of some essential difference between the two cases in fact or law.
  • Explained The decision reached in the primary case is justified by the court in the subsequent case, drawing attention to some feature of the primary case that may not be immediately obvious on its face.
  • Followed This annotation is similar to ‘applied’, but is used in circumstances where the facts in the primary case resemble reasonably closely the facts in the subsequent consideration case.
  • Not followed The court in the subsequent case has declined to apply the principles of law articulated in the primary case.
  • Overruled The legal principles articulated in the primary case are held to be incorrect by the court in the subsequent case, which is a court of superior or equivalent jurisdiction.
  • Questioned The court in the subsequent case has expressed doubt about the decision in the primary case, but does not actually determine that the principles of law in the primary case are incorrect.

The Appeal proceedings section of the CaseBase entry has the following annotations used by the courts:

  • Affirmed The decision in the primary case is upheld on appeal.
  • Reversed The decision in the primary case is overturned on appeal.
  • See The decision in the subsequent case relates in some way to the primary case, but the court in the subsequent case is not assessing the merits of the related primary decision.
  • Varied The decision in the primary case is only partly reversed or partly affirmed by the subsequent case. It is particularly used in circumstances where the court in the subsequent case has altered the quantum of damages awarded or the sentence imposed in the primary case.
  • Related The decision in the subsequent case relates in some way to the primary case, but the court in the primary case is not assessing the merits of the earlier related decision.
  • Special Leave Granted Special leave to appeal the decision in the primary case to the High Court or Privy Council has been granted. There is, therefore, an opportunity for the case itself to be overturned.
  • Special Leave Refused Special leave to appeal the decision in the primary case to the High Court or Privy Council has been refused. Therefore, the case is considered good law.

What do the colours mean?

The colours merely highlight and draw attention to the particular types of treatment.
They do not change or add to the meaning of the annotation.

  • Positive treatments are coloured green. e.g. followed, applied, approved or affirmed
  • Treatments indicating caution required are coloured amber. This can be everything from a distinguishing or explaining treatment (indicating that the law is still good but does not apply in the circumstances), to a varying treatment to a questioning (sometimes called a 'doubting') treatment.
  • Negative treatments are coloured red. e.g. disapproved, not followed, overruled or reversed
  • Neutral treatments are coloured black. e.g. considered or cited

Source: LexisNexisAU Help

See how to Source legal forms from Lexis Advance

View these step-by-step instructions for sourcing legal forms using specific databases:

 

Lexis Advance

Lexis Advance

WestlawAU

International Case Law

Judicial

BAILII - British, Irish, EU case law, legislation and law commission reports

HeinOnline - English Reports (1220-1867) + US material

ICLR - Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, full text authorised case law database (best source for UK and EU cases)

Westlaw UK - UK and EU case law

CommonLII - Case law from 60 Commonwealth and common law jurisdictions

JustCite - Citation and abstract of UK, Irish, EU, Singaporean and other international case law.

Justis - full text of UK, Irish, EU, Singapore and other international case law (judicially considered legislation)

LawCite - a free, automatically generated Australian and international legal case and journal article citator.

Oxford Reports on International Law - full text of public international law decisions

TR Westlaw - full text of international legal resources, includes UK, Canada, US and EU Case Law

Westlaw China - Chinese legal information including Case Headnotes in English, full text in Mandarin.

WorldLII- global international law, broad coverage.

 

Subject

American Maritime Cases - Maritime decisions rendered by US (Federal and State courts), legislative action, administrative law and arbitration decisions and Maritime Law Association of the U.S. source material.

i-law.com - Maritime and related commercial information, includes Lloyd's Law Reports

Investment Claims - Arbitral cases, international law.

Kluwer Arbitration - decisions and awards on UNCITRAL Model Law, Arbitration