
Use the Research Strategy Template to organise your legal research.
Record:
- Databases searched
- Filters used
- Search terms
- Search strings
Cite / reference ALL information at the time of sourcing.
1. Develop a writing plan
what issues must specifically be addressed, answered or included
mind map your plan
2. Develop a search strategy
determine search words
list synonyms
create search strings for searching databases - use Boolean connectors
determine which databases to search
TIP: Read a legal encyclopaedia, or journal, article, to identify additional search terms
3. Manage time and resources
Record all resources, including quotations and their page numbers
4. Reference
TIP: Ensure your reference complies with the Australian Guide to Legal Citation rules when you first access the resource (in Step 3.)
- don't leave your referencing until the last minute.
Use the AGLC Referencing Style Guide for easy citation.
The Library's Assignment Help Guide will assist with organising your assignment.
Task list generators such as To-do, or Trello are useful for group assignments.
Create timelines for each Unit to keep a track of your workload and assist with prioritising your workload.
Timelines can be easily created in an Excel spreadsheet.
Post It Notes are just as effective!
Use the interactive resources on the Academic Skills Unit on LMS to improve your academic reading, critical thinking, research, writing and presentation skills.
Use learning tools, such as Quizlet, to organise your course work and notes in preparation for your research.
For guidance on how to develop a good search strategy and technique see:
Case summary components:
(a) Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment)
(b) Issues (what is in dispute)
(c) Holding (the applied rule of law)
(d) Rationale (reasons for the holding)
More details on writing case summaries:
How To Write a Case Brief For Law School
Issue(s)
Rule(s)
Application
Conclusion
Step 1: Identify Parties by name and their role in proceedings
* plaintiff
* defendant
Step 2: Identify Particulars
* the injury/harm/loss
* the alleged wrong doings
Step 3: Identify all possible Tortious Causes of Action (COA)
Step 4: Identify the Elements of the COA
* define COA
* cite relevant authorities
* this sentence should include Step 1 (identifying the parties), Step 2 (identifying the injuries and alleged wrongdoing), Step 3 (the possible cause of action) and Step 4 (identifying the elements). Note that a relevant legal authority for the law (that is, the elements of the cause of action) should also be cited
eg Patsy, the plaintiff, could sue Darren, the defendant, in negligence for his failure to stop at a red traffic light which caused property damage to her car and personal injury in the form of a broken arm: Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.
Step 5: Identify the law governing the Elements of the COA
* cite relevant authorities which govern the elements of the cause of action the plaintiff is trying to establish
Step 6: Apply the law to the facts
* define/explain each element
* argue whether the legal rule/principle is satisfied by the facts in the scenario using relevant authorities
* every legal principle must be supported with the relevant/best authority (case law or a section of legislation)
* for contentious elements, outline both sides of the argument (e.g. the strengths and weakness of the party’s case)
* use case law as authority OR use case law for analogy
Step 7: Consider Defences
* identify defences arising on the facts
* apply the law to the facts for the relevant defences
Step 8: Consider Remedies
* identify remedies arising on the facts
* apply the law to the facts for the relevant remedies
Step 9: Conclusion
* give a brief conclusion regarding the likely outcome
* highlight the controversial or uncertain matters
* justify your conclusion
Tip:
* use the language of the legislation
example: s 5B of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA) uses the term ‘not insignificant’; use this term, don’t change it to ‘significant’
See how to Mind Map and Plan Your Essay
Legal Writing - Law |
Legal Writing & Research Preparation |
Boolean Operators must be ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.
Universal Operators |
||
|
AND |
2 or more words anywhere in document |
case AND law the word case as well as the word law anywhere in the document |
|
OR |
1 or more words anywhere in document |
case OR law either the word case or the word law anywhere in the document |
|
" " |
phrase search |
"case law" the words case law next to each other in that order |
|
( ) |
group words together |
(case OR law) AND evidence either the word case or the word law anywhere in the document, as well as the word evidence |
Order of priority : ( ), OR, PROXIMITY, AND more detail
Searches are processed by brackets first, then from left to right - so place most important terms first.
| AustLII | CCH IntelliConnect |
Factiva | HeinOnline | i-law | Informit | Jade | Kluwer | Lexis Advance |
Oxford Legal Research |
ProQuest | Thomson Reuters Westlaw Classic |
Westlaw Australia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proximity 1st word within n words of 2nd word case /5 law case within 5 words of law, |
W/5 |
W/5 |
NEAR5 |
W/5 |
NEAR5 |
%5 |
/5 |
NEAR5 |
/5 |
- |
NEAR/5 |
/5 |
/5 |
|
Truncator Word variations law* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
* |
! |
* |
* |
! |
! |
|
At least search word/phrase must appear atleast5(merger) atl5(merger)
|
atln(word) | ATLEASTn(word) |
Provide an overview of current WA law for using a phone when driving
using phone driving
Date range: current Jurisdiction: Western Australia
| using | phone | driving |
|
conduct! distract! hold! inattent! use OR using |
phone telephone text! |
automobile car "dangerous thing!" driv! vehicle |
((conduct! OR distract! OR hold! OR inattent! OR use OR using) /15 (phone OR telephone OR text)) /25 (automobile OR car OR "dangerous thing!" OR driv! OR vehicle)
Search strings are created using search terms, their synonyms, and Boolean operators and connectors.
Example search string:
((balance OR distribut! OR separat!) /5 power!) AND commonwealth AND state
This search string will search for:
balance within 5 words of power - any order
distribute within 5 words of power - any order
distributed within 5 words of power - any order
distribution within 5 words of power - any order
separate within 5 words of power - any order
separated within 5 words of power - any order
separation within 5 words of power - any order
One or more of the above must appear in a document, as well as the word commonwealth, as well as the word state
Note: search words remain in the singular, as the databases will automatically search for singular and plural - even woman/women
Sample search string to source the meaning of slavery:
(character! OR defin! OR describ! OR expla! OR interpret! OR mean!) /25 slave!
|
Identify search words |
||
|
|
|
|
- include all sources consulted to inform you about a topic
- include only those sources cited/referenced in footnotes
MEMORANDUM
TO: [reader] (e.g., instructing lawyer, client, judge)
DATE: [date of submission]
FILE: [file number; client/matter]
SUBJECT: [topic] (describe precisely)
Table of Contents
Background / Purpose
Facts
Assumptions
Issues
Conclusions
Legislation
Discussion / Analysis
Reference List
Appendix
More detail:
Use the URL at the top of the screen for free databases and websites, such as AustLII, Federal Register of Legislation, WA Parliament.
Subscription databases require a permalink, without a session ID.
See the difference:
URL from navigation pane
Permalink URL
Go to Google Scholar.
Click on the 3 lines in the top left of screen.
Select Settings.
Select Library links from the Settings menu.
Type 'Murdoch' into the search box and click Find Library.
Tick the box next to .
Save your new settings.
Now when you search for articles in Google Scholar, you will see a link to Murdoch to the right in the Results list if the articles are in our collection.
This will make it easier for you to determine the title of the journal the articles or studies are published in.
You can then search Ulrichsweb to check if it is a peer-review journal.
APA - Criminology, Education, Nursing, Psychology, Tourism
Chicago - Business & Governance,Transition Units, Multidisciplinary
MLA - English
ACS - Chemistry
AGLC - Law
Footnote - Humanities, Social Sciences
IEEE - Computer Science, Electronics, Engineering, Information Technology
SBL - Theology
Vancouver - Biomedicine, Health Sciences
Word inserts a reference mark in the text and adds the footnote at the bottom of the page.
1. Click where you want to add the footnote.
2. Select References > Insert Footnote.

3. Type the footnote text.
4. To return to your place in your document, double-click the footnote mark.
Shortcut: Ctrl+Alt+F to insert a footnote.
A more detailed explanation can be accessed from How to Add a Footnote to Microsoft Word
|
Step 1: Select Word Count Tool from the status bar in the bottom left of your document. You can count words, lines, paragraphs, and pages. |
![]() |
|
Step 2: Uncheck the box to NOT include footnotes and reference list |
![]() |
To use AGLC with EndNote you will need to download and save 2 small files from the Install AGLC Referencing Style to EndNote link below:
Note: EndNote has a number of issues with AGLC.
Make a Plain Text Copy as a final step and manually edit the Word document into Headings or Sections.
See the EndNote Tips page for more information on EndNote v AGLC.
Microsoft Office 365 ProPlus is available free of charge to all enrolled Murdoch University students.
Each student is allowed to install Microsoft Office on up to 5 devices (Windows, Mac, iPad, Android).
Features of use to students include:
* Magnifyer
* Narrator
* On-screen Keyboard
* Speech Recognition (tip: use a high quality microphone)
* Snipping Tool
Use the Search function in the bottom task bar to access these tools.
In every unit, you will be informed about the marking criteria for assessments.
Different academics will generate this in different ways.
Research essays or written work are marked with consideration given to where the piece of work falls in the context of the grade descriptors.
The marker asks themselves - where does this piece of work sit between a P and an HD?
If you have not met the learning objective, you may be marked lower than a P. The Legal Practice Board expects you to have basic competencies. You cannot receive a pass mark if you do not have these.)
The marker then determines whether the work just scrapes into that grade band, whether it is a solid performance in that grade band, or whether it is almost, but not quite, the grade band above.
The University sets out descriptors for each grade. These are set out in the Unit Guide.
An HD grade recognises the work is of an exceptional standard. That means only a few papers will get it. (Otherwise it would not be exceptional.)
Obtaining such grades takes hard work and a fastidious approach to research and writing.
It needs to be excellent in every respect.
If there are spelling errors, or errors in citation, the mark will drop significantly.
It is virtually impossible to get a mark of 100% in a research essay.
Even a mark of 90% or above is incredibly rare and a mark of 80% is a significant achievement.
You can always improve the quality of expression.
There is always more research that could be done.
The marker has to leave room for the possibility that someone else will come along with an even better piece of writing.
A mark slightly below the percent off the next grade - eg 68% - is a deliberate decision by your marker.
In other words, your work was assessed as being at the higher end of that grade, but not quite at the level of the next grade.
Students who ask 'Where did I lose marks?' have missed the point.
The feedback you receive - whether a marking matrix, comments, or general feedback to the class - should explain to you why you earned that grade.
Some assessments are not assessing your written work.
They might be of a style where you can score 'perfect' marks - such as a Library Research Test, a multi choice assessment, a citation quiz, a grammar quiz, or a research report.
If you follow the instructions to the letter, and understand the task that has been set, you can earn a very high mark.
Such assessments are usually not weighted very much because they can over-inflate the marks overall.
Because it is easy to do well in those types of tests, you cannot necessarily expect those marks to be a predictor of your future performance in the written assessment for the unit.
In other words, 'bank' the marks but don't get complacent!
This marking explanation also applies for exam marking.
- Kate Lewins 2020